Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 4:02 am
School Dist. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2012 NY Slip Op 04668, Court of Appeals Is a public school district an "education corporation or association" within the meaning of Executive Law §296(4)? [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm
The CJEU judgments in eDate Advertising and Bolagsupplysningen have been directly applied in two English court rulings. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:46 am
[Houghton Miflin v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:40 am
Notably, this was not the first time that the Patents had been considered by the English Courts. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
In the case of R (o.t.a P & others) v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
Dissenting on Rubin, Lord Clarke stated that allowing the enforcement of avoidance proceedings was in keeping with the principle of modified universalism requiring the English Courts, so far as is consistent with justice and UK public policy, to co-operate with the courts in the country of the principal liquidation to ensure that a company’s assets are distributed to the creditors under a single system. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 6:08 pm
The CAAF recently decided United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 2:06 pm
16th Century English philosopher and statesman Francis Bacon once said " The ill and unfit choice of words wonderfully obstructs the understanding". [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:48 pm
This is like the Times's reporting on Cohen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
Comment This case has provided the Supreme Court with the opportunity to firmly state that the need for “informed consent” is now part of English law. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:18 am
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:27 pm
Since the Jan. 9 decision of Jesus Arrieta v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:02 am
Moreover, in a subsequent decision, English v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:13 pm
Skelton to have been acting “in the course of employment”, adopting a broad interpretation of the scope of employment (consistent with past case law: Bazely v Curry [1999 174 D.L.R. 4th 45], Lister [2001 UKHL 22] and Mohamud [2016 UKSC 11]). [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
Thankfully, for the thousands of European Patent Attorneys carrying out panic-stricken searches through files hastily-retrieved from the archive, it appears with retrospect that Edwards v Cook represents the high-water mark of the English Courts adopting a strict formulaic approach to priority entitlement. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:24 am
In NTPC v. [read post]
