Search for: "English v. State"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 6,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
State, supra (quoting Deal v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:14 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:34 pm
The main opinion in this case references Troxel v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 4:23 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 10:56 am
" State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:46 am
The language of the arbitration shall be in English. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm
Nevertheless, as the briefs in Smith v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Id. at 460-61 (citing People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
I started reading C.G. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:00 am
” The question for the court was the extent of the connection required between a foreign company and the UK to entitle an English court to wind it up, if its centre of main interests was in another member state of the European Union. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
The Court considered the recent analysis of the English High Court’s power to grant injunctions in the case of Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Limited ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch))(see our discussion here). [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
The Opinion has now been posted in ten official languages of the European Union, but not in English. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:07 pm
Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:39 am
Particularly, the agreement between GW and Otsuka stated that it was governed by New York Law. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm
The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:46 am
This post will cover the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Smith v. [read post]
