Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 30,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2021, 12:49 pm
Adams v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 12:52 pm
Similarly, in “Camp v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 7:15 pm
Same-sex marriage was not legal in New York, and they did not have the resources to travel out of state. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:06 pm
” In this regard, it is crucial to examine the judgment rendered in Rojer Mathew v South Indian Bank Ltd. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:57 am
State of New York, 96 A.D.2d 630, 631 [3rd Dept. 1983]; Senatore v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:55 am
This is consistent with the high court’s rulings in other recent cases limiting Congress’ efforts to subject states to federal law under statutes adopted pursuant to the “commerce clause” such as Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, a case involving suing states in federal court for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.* The high court said that the 11th Amendment bars a state employee from suing his or her employer in… [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:42 am
(SD Kohli v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:57 am
The trial court agreed with Allstate, finding no breach of contract or breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:07 pm
" The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the breach of contract claim because the complaint failed to allege the defendant promised the plaintiff it would restrict competing gift stores to four stores.Analyzing the claim for breach of express and implied covenants, the Court of Appeals stated "an implied covenant to refrain from destructive competition may be inferred from a percentage lease, based on the duty of good faith and fair dealing, where the intentions… [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
United States Steel Corp., ___ U.S. ___ (1/27/14), the Supreme Court of the United States considered the meaning of the phrase "changing clothes" in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 29 U.S.C. section 201 et seq. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 6:52 pm
In the case of Dietz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:03 am
Supreme Court precedent, in Dusky v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 12:21 pm
He had a fair trial. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:12 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:02 pm
In Barbuto v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:29 pm
United States District Judge Janet C. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
The Eighth Circuit upheld this tactic in Rolwing v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 9:52 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
This in turn, Lilly argues, breaches the fair and equitable treatment (FET) and expropriation standard under NAFTA’s investment chapter by interfering with reasonable investment-backed expectations (see a brief description hereand further discussion here).In light of these arguments invoking investment standards against decisions by patent courts, there are several scenarios for investor-state arbitration challenges of UPC judgments: Decisions revoking a patent under… [read post]
