Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 1761 - 1780 of 57,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2023, 10:00 am by Eric Caligiuri
The motion was based on a recent change in ownership of Finjan, Inc., which had a license agreement with Intel. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am by Sherica Celine
In the United States, the principle of data minimization is embedded firmly within the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act, through FTC enforcement activities, and in the host of state-level privacy laws and rules that have proliferated in recent years. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:00 am
COMPANY FAILED TO UNDERTAKE APPROPRIATE INVESTIGATIONAL STUDIESIn mid-October, MW (67), the former CEO of Dolor Technologies, Inc., pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges for selling “misbranded and adulterated devices into interstate commerce. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:12 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Although merely exemplifying the burden imposed on an appellant by the Federal Circuit's substantial evidence standard of review over decisions by the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 3:13 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you to receive future updates by registering on our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Anne Perry and Daniel Alvarado
[4] Lunar Resources, Inc., B-421936, Nov. 14, 2023, 2023 WL 7548222. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:07 am
The California Highway Patrol (CHP) recently issued a press release about a federal grant that’s going to help enhance safety for senior drivers in California. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
Munster Medical Research Foundation, Inc., d/b/a Community Hospital, Case Number 2:23-cv-201) in the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:40 am by David McCombs
The Board held that the requirements of the Federal Circuit’s decision in Dynamic Drinkware, LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:40 am by David McCombs
The Board held that the requirements of the Federal Circuit’s decision in Dynamic Drinkware, LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Except when the plaintiff is required to show a “strong inference” of fraud (which is unnecessary in a Section 11 case), neither federal civil procedure nor the PSLRA requires the plaintiff to prove any form of intent at the motion to dismiss stage. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in the 1943 case of National Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:12 am
  Bear in mind that the FCC, not the Federal Trade Commission, has consumer protection jurisdiction for so-called Title II regulated common carriers, including ventures offering pre-paid and post-paid wireless service. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:12 am
  Bear in mind that the FCC, not the Federal Trade Commission, has consumer protection jurisdiction for so-called Title II regulated common carriers, including ventures offering pre-paid and post-paid wireless service. [read post]