Search for: "Flood v. State" Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
The bill would give three years of copyright protection to new, innovative designs with the hope that such protection would stem off the flood of fast-fashion copies. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 1:39 pm by Michelle Claverol
A good explanation of the general requirements to trigger extra expense coverage can be found in Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 1:39 pm by Michelle Claverol
A good explanation of the general requirements to trigger extra expense coverage can be found in Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Opening door for a further appeal could be opening a flood gate which will cause more wrongs in the society at large at the cost of rights. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:40 am by Kiera Flynn
This week a Michigan state court relied on this Term’s decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:28 am by Erin Kristofco
App. 2010), the insureds’ home flooded with sewage and water, and mold resulted. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Nathaniel Grow
The documentary, which premiered last night, chronicles Curt Flood's historic legal challenge to baseball's reserve clause and antitrust exemption, culminating in the United States Supreme Court's 1972 decision of Flood v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:50 am by David Oxenford
In a decision just published, Prometheus Radio Project v FCC, the Court reviewed the FCC's 2007 actions relaxing the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership rules and adopting policies to increase diversity in broadcast ownership. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Holly Hayes
  However, due to the questionable holding of the United States Supreme Court in Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm by The Legal Blog
Unfortunately, our courts are flooded with these cases because there is an inherent profit for the wrong- doers in our system. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Lea Valley area was not part of the plan, being instead part of a flood risk area and to be developed for the regional park and to lessen flood risk. [read post]