Search for: "Foote v. Grant"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 1,795
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
Yet, for some reason, the New York County Supreme Court didn't see it the same way.In Lopez v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:19 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed, holding that district court remand orders of class actions removed under SLUSA are not reviewable on appeal, see Disher v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
While we conclude that the trial court properly granted Williams's motion to file a belated notice of appeal, we also find that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction. [read post]
Putting traffic detainee in back of police car was investigative technique but without justification
2 Sep 2007, 11:02 am
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 5:00 pm
(State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
In United Pickle Products Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:37 pm
In Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
For the entire time, Goss had access to a public highway by means of a 12-foot wide strip of land which began on his property but continued until it was completely on Trombly’s property.In Goss v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Bill Moyers' interview of Bruce Fein and impeachment proponent John Nichols is illustrative of how the impeachment movement gives short shrift to the most effective tool for checking an out of control President - the Spending Power. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:50 am
Hamdi v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:56 am
In Brown v Christopher St. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 3:21 am
Warshak v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:24 am
Stewart v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:46 am
Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited opinion in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 3:23 am
The Court was not willing to entertain Becker's taking argument, since it was not clear that the Board's decision would preclude all economically beneficial use of the property, but noted that denail of variances might, under some circumstances, constitute a taking.Finally, the Court noted that the Board was not an administrative body which had discretion to do or not do an act, for which a mere statement that the applying party had failed to satisfy the burden of persuasion would suffice,… [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 4:46 am
Rowe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 3:00 am
In the case at hand, the "call" set the boundary of that property being granted by referencing the boundary of another property beyond which the lands being granted did not go. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 9:14 am
Charles Tower, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:23 am
., et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:38 am
The effect of exercise of these orders is, however, that infringement actions are on foot in Germany and the Netherlands. [read post]
