Search for: "George v. Person"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 3,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 9:50 pm
Nine years ago, Congressman Kucinich had a similar War Powers violation suit against President George W. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 1:48 am
, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Kendall v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Before the oral arguments yesterday in The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 4:26 pm
A person who accurately describes Miranda v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:57 am
In Tingler v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
A & B v Persons Unknown. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Leaders and voters in both parties want greater protection for personal privacy and security of personal data in this digital age. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
See Graham v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The three most-consulted French-language decisions were: Gestion George Kyritsis inc. c. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
(I noticed, when checking for additional facts, that George Washington Law Professor Orin Kerr has blogged on this subject, and he located federal cases with even closer factual situations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
(I noticed, when checking for additional facts, that George Washington Law Professor Orin Kerr has blogged on this subject, and he located federal cases with even closer factual situations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
II, defined to include “all persons who can be said to hold an office under the government” in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
George Denkowski diagnosed James Clark as mentally retarded, a person with a 65 IQ and three adaptive behavior deficits. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Kitson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:37 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
This case arose in the aftermath of Matal v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
By that I meant that, like all constitutional provisions, the Second Amendment lies in the background as an outer limit on what can be done, just as (for example) the Fifth and Sixteenth amendments place limits on the “takings” and taxation powers, respectively.Just as a safety requirement for a consumer good is generally not a taking and a decision to raise the top marginal income tax rate does not violate the Sixteenth Amendment, even the most aggressive gun control efforts that are… [read post]
