Search for: "Ginsburg v. United States" Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:02 am by Kent Scheidegger
Justice Ginsburg adds a brief statement noting that the precedent may be distinguishable but not opposing a remand to the Ninth to properly consider it.Justice Alito dissents from the turn-down of National Review, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:25 am by Rachel Sachs
ProPublica explores states’ varied responses to the Court’s consolidated opinion in Miller v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
In any event, the practice in many States already accords with today's decision, and the serious disruption predicted by respondent and the dissent has not materialized.The other case is Safford United School District # 1 v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had the Court’s decision in the bankruptcy case Harris v Viegelahn. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm by Orin Kerr
Justices Breyer and Ginsburg are pretty obvious votes for the mandate, as they dissented in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Karson Taylor
Shimabukuro explains that in Virginia v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Snyder's case was back before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Nabiha Syed
Elsewhere, coverage looks ahead to Wednesday’s scheduled oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:16 am
Joining his opinion were Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor (right). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:30 am
Jakes stated that the rule was set forth in Diamond v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am by Andrew Hamm
Securities and Exchange Commission, in which the court will consider whether administrative law judges of the SEC are officers of the United States within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]