Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 44,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
Court sustains Commissioner of Education’s determination suspending educator’s certification for one year after finding he lacked good moral characterMatter of Mudge v Huxley, 2010 NY Slip Op 09311, Decided on December 16, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentRandy Mudge, a certified as a teacher and school administrator, requested a hearing in response to a notice from the State Department of Education that a substantial question existed with respect to… [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 12:11 pm
We note that the Nevada Supreme Court recently decided A Cab, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
And on this basis, you can understand it as of a piece with the other anti-war play, Henry V--just Henry V carried remorselessly to its logical conclusion.The Ashland Henry V is not exactly a top-of-the-chart presentation: good enough, but you could wish for better. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
And on this basis, you can understand it as of a piece with the other anti-war play, Henry V--just Henry V carried remorselessly to its logical conclusion.The Ashland Henry V is not exactly a top-of-the-chart presentation: good enough, but you could wish for better. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Plourde v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 7:58 am
He brought a state court class action lawsuit against Ripoff Report, alleging violations of CA B&P 17200 and the implied covenant of good faith. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 9:36 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:15 am
Holder v. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 5:39 pm
” The predominant purpose test asks “whether (the contract’s) predominant factor, (its) thrust, (its) purpose, reasonably stated, is the rendition of service, with goods incidentally involved (e.g., contract with artist for painting) or is a transaction of sale, labor incidentally involved (e.g., installation of a water heater in a bathroom). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:50 am
On Monday, in Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 8:55 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Puglisi v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 7:31 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 12:31 pm
May 6, 2010), is a good example of a well-crafted opinion. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
We want to organize efforts and share information to find out why these appraisals are not being paid and to make certain that this new State Farm process is totally in good faith and reflects State Farm’s “Good Neighbor” promise. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Christopher et al. v. [read post]
