Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 61,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
The first is whether states are required by the Fourteenth Amendment to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:07 am
Abstract: While the Supreme Court regularly decides cases defining the limits of the criminal jurisdiction of tribal courts, when it heard United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
In Geier v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:26 pm
Based on what Bloomberg reported earlier this month, a second United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:46 am
Here is the opinion in State Bar of Arizona v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 4:45 am
Carballo v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 12:15 am
Vermont v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 12:15 am
Vermont v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:31 am
In Herring v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:39 am
Review granted on the following specified issue: WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
Alameda Gateway, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 8:48 pm
Again without having actually eyeballed the order, I understand that CAAF yesterday granted review of the something like the following issue:WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT FOUND THAT A PROVISION IN APPELLANT'S PRETRIAL AGREEMENT TO "WAIVE ALL WAIVABLE MOTIONS" WAS AN EXPRESS WAIVER THAT BARS APPELLANT FROM ASSERTING ANY CLAIMS OF MULTIPLICITY OR UNREASONABLE MULTIPLICATION OF CHARGES ON APPEAL.United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:22 pm
That extension — considerably less than the added thirty days the states had sought — makes it more likely that the case, United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:49 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Diaz v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:39 pm
On August 3, 2011, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a motion for the recognition of an arbitral award in the matter Continental Transfert Technique Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 11:53 am
On June 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
DaimlerChrysler v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
Johnson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
