Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 1761 - 1780 of 5,732
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2017, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
Pokoik other than two blog posts I wrote about two other cases he brought against family members involved in his real estate ventures, in both of which he won significant victories. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am by Jenny Gesley
The Ordinance was challenged  by a person acting as an accountant for a temple trust before the Allahabad High Court in B Ram Lal v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
When the order list came out the following Monday, there were no asterisks announcing he hadn’t participated in considering the cases as a general matter. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:16 pm by Mitch Stoltz
As EFF and Public Knowledge told the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the BMG v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:00 am
  He said that the big patent holders were interested in fostering the market rather than destroying it and that required a dialogue between patent holders and implementers, especially in the IoT sphere. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
Holder, the justices invalidated a provision of the Voting Rights Act that required jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting to obtain preclearance before they would be permitted to change voting procedures. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
He considered there to be a public interest in publishing the information for two principal reasons. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:21 am by Dennis Crouch
District Judge James Robart in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Larry Tolchinsky
They also paid future mortgage payments to the new mortgage holder. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  The Federalists believed that the people were for them, but that the holders of state office would oppose them. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
Agent Hornback soon determined that he had located Adkinson's public Facebook account.U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:21 am by Brian Cordery
On a final note, the judge held that UP did not abuse its position of dominance as an SEP holder by prematurely issuing proceedings; the steps set out in Huawei v ZTE should be applied with a pinch of salt. [read post]