Search for: "IN RE WRIGHT"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 1,782
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2006, 1:15 pm
If you're a prawf at the end of your first (or second or nth) semester, please feel free to share any interesting stories and reflections in the comments. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 10:51 am
*Let's see: Boston pays $51.1 million for the rights to negotiate for a pitcher, who will no doubt want a 10-year, $100+ M K (remember, Boras is his agent).... while we unload Jaret Wright and Gary Whine-Whine Sheffield -- for a boatload of young arms -- AND we're about to re-sign Moose.. and we get back our boy Joe Girardi!! [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 5:50 am
Loeffler, supra, 694 F.2d at 492, 13B Wright, Miller & Cooper, supra, at 461. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 11:46 am
" And of course, if you're more comfortable with Lexis, you can use the Lexis Alert feature to keep you up-to-date. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 6:12 am
See In re Sun Pipe Line Co., 831 F.2d 22, 24-25 (1st Cir.1987). [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 2:07 pm
Cir. 2000); see also In re Wright, 569 F.2d 1124, 1127 (C.C.P.A. 1977) ("Absent any written description in the specification of quantitative values, arguments based on measurement of a drawing are of little value. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 2:19 pm
(This point is reinforced in Lawrence Wright's The Looming Tower, which reports that even some top Al Qaeda leaders argued against directly attacking the United States pre-9/11.) [read post]
28 Sep 2006, 9:42 pm
(I must know 20 or 30 Kozinski clerks, and on the whole they're pretty hard to pigeonhole politically.) [read post]
18 Sep 2006, 8:40 am
***Puliyur Sudarsanam, Mike Wright, and Jian Huang: "Going Private Buyouts and Shareholder Wealth Gains: Impact of Bankruptcy Risk" (Abstract ID: 967731):Using a sample of 236 UK companies that went from public to private (PTP) company status during 1997 to 2005 and a control sample of similar firms not going private, we study, with logistic regression methodology, the impact of bankruptcy risk measured by their default probability, estimated using stock market data and option… [read post]
14 Sep 2006, 5:23 am
So, using "to pretext" as meaning to lie (or, minimally, to falsely pretend), George and company pretexted about WMDs, pretexted about the use of rendition and torture, pretexted about the real reasons for using military tribunals (the "real reason was that they knew civilian courts would not let in evidence obtained by torture), pretexted about the competence of the government's response to Katrina (remember "You're doing a heck of a job Brownie?) [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 6:08 pm
Some of my favorite bloggers (Ribstein, Josh Wright and Geoff Manne (aka TOTM) are rather harshly attacking Matt Bodie's recent post about options backdating. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 2:50 pm
Manne & Wright want you to believe there is no lie so strongly they're willing to say it in all caps -- "THERE IS NO LIE. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 2:03 pm
The London plot against civil aviation confirmed a theme of an illuminating new book, Lawrence Wright's "The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
Wright, 468 U.S. 737,751, 104 S.Ct. 3315, 3324, 82 L.Ed.2d 556 (1984))". [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 2:18 pm
Applying a Wright Line analysis, the Board determined that the General Counsel demonstrated that Page's dues delinquency and antiunion views were motivating factors in the Committee's actions and that the Respondents failed to rebut the inference of unlawful motive. [read post]
19 Apr 2006, 8:15 am
In re Carver, 2006 WL 563321 (Bankr. [read post]
19 Apr 2006, 8:15 am
In re Carver, 2006 WL 563321 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 6:16 am
In re Johnson, 2006 WL 270231; In re Robinson, 2006 WL 349801; In re Wright, 2006 WL 547824.None of those cases answer the question that is posed in In re Ezell, 338 B.R. 330 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 6:16 am
In re Johnson, 2006 WL 270231; In re Robinson, 2006 WL 349801; In re Wright, 2006 WL 547824.None of those cases answer the question that is posed in In re Ezell, 338 B.R. 330 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am
As a result, the lender did not have the protections of 1325(a)(*).In In re Wright, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 547824 (Bankr. [read post]
