Search for: "In re: Roger" Results 1761 - 1780 of 3,496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2019, 8:12 am by Ruth Carter
Will I Call You Out When You’re Wrong? [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
That case appears to have settled and the leading case on art reproductions of photos remains Rogers v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:31 am
The incumbents up for re-election are, figuratively, dead men walking. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 8:08 am by Jim Gerl
Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Roger Sherman and Robert R. [read post]
9 May 2015, 5:57 pm by Brian Shiffrin
  (Thanks Roger Brazill for the GAO article and suggestion for my motion.)2. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig., 2019 WL 1789789, No. 14-MD-2542 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 9:02 am by Michael C. Dorf
They're Goliath and, as Wilt Chamberlain memorably said, "nobody roots for Goliath. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:18 pm by Florian Mueller
They don't want it; they want a solution as quickly as possible, and maybe they're uneasy about what the Supreme Court might do in the next step. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Clinton re-nominated Garland in January 1997, and he was confirmed approximately three months later by a vote of 76-23. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Biden Super PAC Plans a Historic $250 Million Ad Blitz DNyuz – Reid Epstein and Shane Goldmacher (New York Times) | Published: 1/30/2024 The main Democratic super PAC supporting President Biden’s re-election bid, Future Forward, is beginning to reserve $250 million in advertising across the most important battleground states. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[Although these are presumptions about how consumers will think, so we’re not just expecting, we’re hypothesizing and holding as a matter of law.] [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bounced around the circuit courts in search for some kind of coherence; Rogers v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:59 am by David Rodnitzky
You’re happy because you’re successful for now. [read post]