Search for: "In re J. C."
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
The Corte di Cassazione relied on CJEU decision in Case C-133/11 Folien Fisher v Ritrama (a case concerning unfair competition, not patent infringement) in which it was held that "paragraph (3) of Article 5 of Regulation No. 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that an action for a negative declaration seeking to establish the absence of liability in tort, delict, or quasi-delict falls within the scope of that provision".The Katpedo is already… [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:37 pm
We need to re-think our doctrine on this important point. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
” -- see Eleonora Rosati’s view on the important case Soulier and Doke, C-301/15. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
The CJEU called to mind its recent decision in C-104/18 Koton and reiterated that the concept of bad faith "presupposes the presence of a dishonest state of mind". [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
On Friday 17 March 2023, judgment on costs was handed down by Friedman J in Musst Holdings Ltd v Astra Asset Management UK Ltd & Anor (Re Costs) [2023] EWHC 595 (Ch). [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
En effet, comment pourrait-on reprocher au juge de première instance d’avoir omis de considérer dans son analyse d’autres violations de la Charte canadienne (toutes hypothétiques) alors qu’elles ont déjà été tranchées ou autrement examinées? [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
J&J: Is there a hidden wisdom behind it? [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
The CJEU has just issued its much-awaited decision in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters, addressing the adaptation right in the InfoSoc Directive and copyright exhaustion. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
Qatar Jillian C. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
J. 982 (Apr. 27, 2018). [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:08 pm
Comment: It's all very trendy now to use acronyms and hip jargon like "C-suite", S2KM, S2PJ, P&J and BM, in an attempt to give off the impression to potential advertisers that you know what you're doing, but how many tort victims do you suppose a "C-suiter" has worked with one on one? [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 12:37 am
Skykick (C-371/18) – see the earlier blog here. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
Taps Rebecca J. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:50 pm
As such, the district court did not commit error when it declined to provide Appellant equitable relief due to any peculiar circumstances under § 2-7-703(c).J. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 3:22 pm
(C) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS- The provisions of subsections (a), (d), (e), (f), (h), (j), (k), and (l) of section 505A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act shall apply with respect to the extension of a period under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph to the same extent and in the same manner as such provisions apply with respect to the extension of a period under subsection (b) or (c) of section 505A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:08 pm
O ambulatório da Fundancentro existe desde 1984 e já atendeu mais de 3 mil pacientes encaminhados pelo SUS com suspeitas de doenças pulmonares, dos quais 1.333 foram expostos ao asbesto. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 11:00 am
§ 1453(c)(1). [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:34 pm
ki j? [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 5:08 am
Whether they failed miserably, and whether the cost-benefit analysis favored saving Ronell at the expense of Reitman, however, is why they’re being sued. [read post]
