Search for: "In re J. C."
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
He was introduced–we’re told, memorably–by Justice Elena Kagan. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., 15A-145.5(c)(3). [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., 15A-145.5(c)(3). [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:40 am
Esta cooperativa facilitará la sustentabilidad alimentaria de las cárceles y fortalecerá la reinserción del confinado en el ambiente social y laboral. iii. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Elizabeth C., after rejecting it twice nearly two decades apart.In addition, some states had begun to recognize enforceable co-parenting agreements—creating a result similar to de facto parentage but by contract rather than by action. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:55 am
En plus des lignes directrices prévues à ces documents, le ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux met à la disposition des CÉRs un service de consultation[10] qui a pour objectif de soutenir les membres des CÉR et leur personnel de soutien dans l’exercice de leur fonction[11]. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Québec (Procureure générale) (Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques) c. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
Michaels, and Paul C. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
In re TC Heartland, LLC, No. 2016-105, at 10 (Fed. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 1:04 pm
Offending Party Action in Question ERISA Section Penalty As of August 15, 2016 Penalty Effective August 16, 2016 Employer Failure to maintain records or furnish information sufficient to determine benefits 209(b) $11 per employee $28 per employee Plan administrator Failure/refusal to file annual report (Form 5500) with DOL 502(c)(2) $1,100 per day $2,063 per day Administrator of multiemployer plan Failure to certify endangered or critical (funding) status … [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
Application to re-amend DefenceThis decision concerned an application by Servier to re-amend its Defence, in a form which can be summarised as follows:1. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
See Rule 9(j)(1)(iii), RLPR. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 6:35 am
As you know, there is a sense of déjà vu when it comes to Privacy Act reviews. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 3:00 am
WFAA reports that the new District Attorney candidates include Jennifer J. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
Agado, 964 P.2d 565, 569 (Colorado Court of Appeals 1998) (Briggs, J., specially concurring), and citing several other cases). [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 5:08 pm
Ehrlich 212-373-3166 aehrlich@paulweiss.com Robert C. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
It is therefore exceedingly difficult to justify Binchy J’s treatment of section 27(2)(c) as by itself establishing a defence. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
However, he declined to grant injunctions requiring Facebook either to remove the posts or to prevent the material in them from being re-posted, on the grounds that Facebook could rely on the defence of innocent publication in section 27 of the Defamation Act 2009 (also here). [read post]
