Search for: "In re Rogers" Results 1761 - 1780 of 3,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2022, 2:47 pm
 Vertical Agreements (Swiss Law) Distribution Agreements (Swiss Law)   Notion de contrat de distribution (c. 7.1.1.) [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:27 am by Florian Mueller
Once you're past that threshold, there may also be a second-degree aftermarket (here, IAP) or even nth-degree aftermarkets. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm by Garrett West
 Of note, the dissent includes a footnote (at pg. 16) suggesting that the district court could impose a more severe punishment during re-sentencing. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm by Garrett West
 Of note, the dissent includes a footnote (at pg. 16) suggesting that the district court could impose a more severe punishment during re-sentencing. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
"When you're dealing with fresh food and real people, you're going to connect people to people. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 10:04 pm by Michael Geist
My submission: Re:  Trans Pacific Partnership Consultation I am a law professor at the University of Ottawa, Common Law Section where I hold the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
(More disclosure: During the relevant period, I worked at a subsidiary of Gen Re.) [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Already we’re starting to see the details wearing away. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Saraphin Dhanani
” Herein lies the core problem when 1512(c)(2) is interpreted beyond the plain meaning of the text: “You’re going down a path where you’re going to end up with no one really knowing what this means. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Not clear we have a right answer in © but at least we’re thinking about it. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  (They’re never going to stop complaining about foreign sites, though.) [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
”[21] Under this test, Ginger Rogers and the estate of Fred Astaire could not prevent a filmmaker from using the title “Ginger and Fred” in a fictional film because the use was “clearly related to the content of the movie and is not a disguised advertisement for the sale of goods or services or a collateral commercial product. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gov’t influencing/coercing speech is something we’re not comfortable with. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 6:12 am by Derek Muller
If you’re a prospective law student, re-read that bold sentence a few times. [read post]