Search for: "Jess Bravin"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 1,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
” For The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Jess Bravin reports that “[t]he unsigned, two-page opinion was an anticlimactic end to a case once expected to open a new chapter in gun rights[, b]ut the court’s pause may be short-lived. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:08 am
Jess Bravin reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall observe that while “the arrival of a new justice is a historic event, Monday’s arguments were a reminder that not every case before the Supreme Court is a landmark. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
” Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal describes Kagan’s involvement in the Paula Jones suit. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am
” For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that “[t]he Supreme Court’s complicated, often unpredictable approach to the death penalty was evident this week when a three-day period produced decisions where different combinations of justices alternately upheld, halted and questioned executions on an array of grounds. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
” Additional coverage comes from Erin Fuchs at Yahoo Finance and from Jess Bravin and Ryan Knutsen for The Wall Street Journal, who report that “there is widespread criticism that allowing authorities to compile such granular data about an individual’s life, without a judicial warrant, no longer meets society’s ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’—the touchstone of the Supreme Court’s approach to constitutional limits on searches and… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” According to the Wall Street Journal’s Jess Bravin, the tenor of the argument “suggested that even the conservative justices who formed the Citizens United majority can be skeptical of claims that corporations are the legal equivalent of flesh-and-blood human beings”; indeed, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press points out that “[t]here was no mention of the Citizens United ruling” during oral argument. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 4:39 am
” Additional coverage comes from Seung Min Kim and Elise Viebeck for The Washington Post, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Kristina Peterson and Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Burgess Everett and Edward-Isaac Dovere at Politico, and Jennifer Haberkorn for the Los Angeles Times, who reports that the Intercept, an online news publication that originally revealed the existence of the letter, “said the letter apparently describes an incident involving Kavanaugh and a… [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 3:11 pm
All Justices, according to the Wall Street Journal’s Supreme Court correspondent Jess Bravin, appeared to be “sceptical and at times scornful ... to arguments that there should be broader patent protection for ‘business methods’”. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
” Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Mark Walsh for Education Week’s School Law Blog, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Josh Gerstein at Politico, Marcia Coyle and Tony Mauro at Law.com, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, Sam Baker at Axios, Jaclyn Belczyk at Jurist, Richard Wolf for USA Today, and Jess Bravin at The Wall Street Journal, who… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” Additional coverage of the new term comes from Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Shannon Bream and Bill Mears at Fox News, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Richard Wolf for USA Today, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, and Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, who reports that the court is facing a “gauntlet of highly polarizing disputes that could make the relative comity of its previous term impossible to replicate. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
Jess Bravin has an article in the Wall Street Journal recapping the argument, and indicating that the Justices "seemed inclined to dismiss" the case, which concerns a property owner's ability to challenge a forfeiture system permitting police seizure of his property for the purposes of a narcotics investigation. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
” Briefly: For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that “[s]hortly before his death in February 2016, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia spoke favorably of Donald Trump’s presidential run,” according to “the late jurist’s literary collaborator, Bryan Garner. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
Additional coverage comes from Mark Matthews for The Denver Post, Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Steven Mazie for The Economist’s Espresso blog, and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, who reports that “[t]he case’s importance is underscored by the attention it has received: 100 amicus briefs have been filed and people began camping out Friday afternoon on the sidewalk in front of the Supreme Court to secure a spot” in the courtroom for the… [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
” For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall report that “if other courts’ experiences are any guide, the new format could stray from the crisp hourlong sessions that Chief Justice Roberts strives to run. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
” Additional coverage of the DACA case comes from Jess Bravin, Brent Kendall and Michelle Hackman for The Wall Street Journal (subscription required); Tucker Higgins at CNBC; Pete Williams at NBC News; Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, (subscription required); Jonathan Blitzer at The New Yorker; Steven Mazie for The Economist, here and here, and on The Intelligence podcast here; Richard Wolf for USA Today, here and here; and Nina Totenberg at NPR,… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal examines Justice Kennedy’s influence on the Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
Additional coverage of the arguments in Byrd and Collins comes from Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Richard Wolf at USA Today, Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Jessica Gresko at the Associated Press, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, and Nina Totenberg at NPR, who reports that “[i]n both cases the justices seemed divided on how to draw the lines, with Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch giving indications he might side with the court’s liberals, and Justice Anthony… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” According to the Wall Street Journal’s Jess Bravin, the tenor of the argument “suggested that even the conservative justices who formed the Citizens United majority can be skeptical of claims that corporations are the legal equivalent of flesh-and-blood human beings”; indeed, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press points out that “[t]here was no mention of the Citizens United ruling” during oral argument. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
They include offerings from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, Adam Liptak in The New York Times, WBUR’s On Point (audio), Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Scott Bomboy at Constitution Daily, and Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal, who reports that the term begins “with a conservative majority and a docket filled with longtime conservative goals to go with it. [read post]
