Search for: "Kennedy v State"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 7,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
United States, having to do with fish, Indian treaties, and culvert design, with Justice Kennedy recused.The Court took up no new cases for full argument and briefing. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:10 pm
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court issued a long-anticipated decision in City of Ontario v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:17 am
Caperton v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
Check the United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:29 am
The United States Supreme Court issued three decisions today, none with major implications.In Puerto Rico v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:18 am
In its 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 5:37 am
In Rapanos, Justice Kennedy urged that a "significant nexus" to waters of the United States must be established for jurisdiction over wetlands to exist under the act. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:54 am
What we do know, however, is that 5 Justices, namely Justices Kennedy, Roberts, Thomas, Alito and Scalia all agreed that business methods are patentable subject matter. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:05 am
Kennedy, and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Here is how Tymkovich (who, by the way, argued on behalf of the state of Colorado unsuccessfully in Romer v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:07 pm
Breyer, Kennedy and David H. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Carpenter v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:37 pm
Supreme Court concluded in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
Brown)United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:28 pm
Graham v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
Currently pending before the Supreme Court is Sackett v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
Currently pending before the Supreme Court is Sackett v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
Currently pending before the Supreme Court is Sackett v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
In New York v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am
Coverage of the Court continues to focus on the fallout from its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
