Search for: "Kerr v. Kerr"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2019, 10:41 am
Bank One, Tex., N.A. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am
The Fourth Circuit just decided United States v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
In Roberts v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:39 am
The first argued case in the new Supreme Court term will be Heien v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
Remember how cool it was when the Third Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:59 am
It just may be, if David Kopel at VC is correct when he writes: District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:19 am
Not because seven months is such a big deal, but because her decision in Hedges v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:52 am
Sheenan v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:33 am
Sorry if this is as annoying to you as it is to us, but you made the rules and we are constrained to play by them.H/T Orin Kerr at Volokh Conspiracy © 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
At the US Supreme Court case this week, the opinion in US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Kerr 14-460Issue: (1) Whether, after this Court's decision in New York v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
Kerr dissed the D.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm
Whatever the reason, Lords Kerr and Reed and Lady Black have outdone themselves by giving the defendants in Lachaux v IPL & ors [2018] 2 WLR 387 permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am
This is a live blog of the second and final day of the hearing of the appeal brought by the Scotch Whisky Association and others, concerning the lawfulness of the Scottish Government’s plans to introduce minimum pricing for alcohol. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:39 am
The judge reasoned that:“…the infringement of a trade mark is at stake, which by its nature implies some urgency, as ‘The life of a trade mark depends on the promptitude with which it is vindicated…’ (Kerr on Injunctions 363, quoted in Tullen Industries Ltd v A de Souza Costa (Pty) Ltd 1976 (4) SA 220 (W) 220B). [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 8:38 pm
See State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:00 pm
” Canada should take the lead from the United States federal court’s decision in Sandvig v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
Further commentary comes from Orin Kerr at The Volokh Conspiracy and Mark Tushnet at Balkinization. [read post]
