Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,050
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 3:51 am
The court went on to state that the Lord Ordinary had a reasonable evidential basis for finding on an objective analysis that the bank made a legally binding promise in the telephone call of 14 June 2007 to provide development finding. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:34 am
Lord Reed stated on behalf of all the justices that the starting point for the contractual interpretation is the words the parties used in condition 11.9(a). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
FLAG -- meets next week on the evening of 18 March, in the House of Lords, London. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm
The emails were distributed to 28 UK Hindu temples, members of the House of Lords, MPs and others. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Data Protection and Data Privacy European regulators need to further control civilian drone use, according to a paper released by a House of Lords committee. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
Thus, as stated by Lord Lloyd with respect to building cases, the loss is “almost always measured in one of two ways: either the difference in the value of the work done or the cost of reinstatement” ….. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:44 am
I spend the morning reading into Privy Council case of Hunte and another v The State, a miscarriage of justice case from Trinidad and Tobago that is starting next week. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Gelfuso v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm
John Catt has indicated that he will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights – historically the court has been far stricter on the requirement of accordance with the law and therefore far less willing to allow the state wide discretionary powers where privacy and surveillance are concerned, resulting in a series of rulings against the UK – see Malone v UK (1984), Hewitt v UK (1992), Liberty & Others v UK (2008), S &… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:13 am
Lord Toulson, Lord Kerr and Lord Neuberger in the majority stated that Hamblen J had reached an entirely proper conclusion that the role played by the appellant, based mainly on its fundraising relating to a small sum solicited by the Sea Shepherd Conversation Society (SSCS), had been of minimal importance. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
Lord Toulson would have dismissed the police’s appeal, stating that he did not think that the evidence given by the police explains why they need to retain the information for many years after the event about someone about whom they have concluded that he was not known to act violently. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:42 am
The Supreme Court stated in dismissing the claim that s 94(5) of the Act reads as referring to countries where its citizens are free from any serious risk of systematic persecution either by the state or by non-state agents. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
I expect this is just a typo, and lord knows I’ve made plenty of those over the years. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
The UK House of Lords has also said in Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union (1995) 2 AC 513 (HL) that a situation where the executive never enforces a statute while continuing another legislation can never arise. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 1:10 pm
So, for instance, when the courts examined whether abortion statistics were personal data as part of the Department of Health v ICO litigation, they considered a previous House of Lords decision on the meaning of personal data under the DPA. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:41 am
The distribution of that money in the Member State is jointly determined under a Partnership Agreement which must be proposed by the Member State and approved by the Commission. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
At [34] the CA stated the general rule in future. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:57 am
However, distinguishing the present case from the leading case of Osman v UK (1998) 29 EHRR 245, Lord Justice Longmore held that the claim for a breach of the ECHR, art 2 should go to trial. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Best, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) [2015] EWCA Civ 17 The Court of Appeal considered the clash of s.144 LASPO and the rules on adverse possession, on appeal from the Administrative Court. [read post]
