Search for: "MYERS v. MYERS" Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2010, 9:40 am by MacIsaac
I do not accept those submissions, which have been made and rejected in several other cases: see Myers v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  I will be a speaker, along with Craig Corbitt of Zelle Hofmann, Ken O'Rourke of O'Melveny & Myers, and John Landry of Sheppard Mullin (moderator). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:17 am by Marcia Oddi
For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (1): Charles Michael Myers v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:14 pm by Steve Matthews
Michael Myers of McClanahan Myers Espey received the honor of being named one of Houston’s “Top Lawyers for Civil Litigation” by H-Texas Magazine. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:18 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Chief Justice Roberts in a 5-4 decision (conservatives v. liberals), declared as unconstitutional the "dual for-cause limitations on the removal of [PCAOB] Board members". [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 181 F.R.D. 365 (N.D. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
They ask as follows: "(i) Are Article 7(2) of [the repealed and re-enacted but regularly cited] Council Directive 89/104 ... to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and the associated case-law, in particular the judgments of the Court of Justice in Cases 102/77 Hoffmann-La Roche v Centrafarm and 1/81 Pfizer v Eurim-Pharm and Joined Cases C-427/93, C-429/93 and C-436/93 Bristol-Myers Squibb and Others v Paranova, to be interpreted… [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:41 pm by Jay Willis
  In light of President Obama’s specific comments that Kagan “chose” to take on Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:27 am by Jeff Gamso
No exceptions.. . .In District Attorney's Office for the 3rd Judicial District v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 4:20 pm by Adrian Lurssen
G-146 Voluntary Departure Form[By: Robert Myers |In: Immigration Law]18. [read post]
30 May 2010, 7:59 pm
" In a concurring opinion in the Supreme Court flag-burning case (Texas v. [read post]