Search for: "Majors v. Majors" Results 1761 - 1780 of 55,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to add three new cases for decision at its next Term -- cases on a major issue in commodities exchange regulation (Klein & Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Majority Decision in United States v Ballard By a vote of 5-4, the Supreme Court reversed. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 6:28 am
   (Supreme Court 2007, 05-608) The issue, as articulated by Justice Scalia in the majority (8-1) opinion, was as follows:   [W]hether Article III's limitation of federal courts' jurisdiction to “Cases” and “Controversies,” reflected in the “actual controversy” requirement of the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U. [...] [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:05 am by Dan Ernst
The article begins by analyzing the case’s overruling of the majority of lower courts which had found high caste Hindus to be racially eligible for naturalization, two of which the Court had expressly approved of only three months earlier in Ozawa v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
by Jeremy Leaming Since the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 6:25 pm
Wednesday's controversial Supreme Court decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 8:54 am
" So begins the majority opinion in today's 5-4 ruling of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington in Soter v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:33 pm by Madelaine Lane
On July 14, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published Chief Justice Kelly’s majority opinion in Adair v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
  By a majority of 5:2, it held that the pre-Jackson regime was compatible with Article 6 and Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:52 am
The Supreme Court's statement of issues on review in Reid v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:02 am by Derek T. Muller
I’ve taken a day to chew over the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiafalo v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
“[B]ecause the collective bargaining agreement establishes that any resolution of a grievance by majority vote of the joint committee is ‘final and binding on all parties and individuals bound by’ the [...] [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:36 pm
With Coleman's concession, this ends the saga; Al Franken will be seated, giving the Democratic party a 60 person "super" majority. [read post]