Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 5,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
U.S. (1951) Frankfurter stressed that “[c]ourts are not representative bodies. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 3:08 pm
I am not advocating the use of secret trusts in this manner as a good estate-planning tool, but merely highlighting the inconsistency. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 12:00 pm
That’s right, the Council on Foreign Relations says President Trump is doing a really good job with China. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 8:14 am
TIB-The Independent Bankersbank issued April 19, 2019)No. 05-18-00168-CV [Link to COA Docket]Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas.Opinion Filed February 6, 2019Christopher Deloney, Mark C. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:43 pm
So that’s all good news for Trump. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
A second amendment to Green’s approach concerns (c). [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:37 am
Textilis Ltd and Mr Keskin counterclaimed for invalidity of the EUTM for being a shape which gives a substantial value to the goods. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
It fell to McDonald’s to prove it had put the mark to genuine use in the EU for a variety of goods in Classes 29, 30 and 42 – including for “meat sandwiches” (ie, burger in a bun). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:54 pm
Fiduciary Law, Good Faith, and Publicness, Hillary A. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
[The I heart DC case might be a good place to start with this argument.]Until we have more statutory defenses, categorical exclusions for [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 1:32 am
The overall impression given by the trade mark applied for to the relevant public must be taken as a basis (C‑136/02 P ‘Maglite’). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
Is market definition in fact ubiquitous in trademark law analysis because it is an inquiry implicitly undertaken whenever a mark owner defines the underlying goods or services with which the mark is used? [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
Focusing on defining marks is important b/c multifactor infringement test often zooms back & forth b/t what the mark is in analyzing the different factors. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:17 am
The use of the ‘X’ at the end of the opposed mark was according to the Court sufficiently different from the opposing marks which simply exchanged the letter ‘C’ in the descriptive term “inject” with the letter ‘K’. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:32 pm
Last Thursday Advocate General (AG) Kokott handed down her Opinion in case C-104/18 P Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v Euipo (C-104/18 P). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
His address specifically considered the key issue of the case: whether the lack of clarity and precision of specifications of goods or services and bad faith though lack of intent to use were grounds of invalidity. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:16 am
It held that consumers of applicant’s goods would make an association with the opposer’s goods as the marks are similar in how they look and sound and in the meaning they convey. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:29 am
By Dawn C. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:45 am
And so, the Board affirmed the refusal to register Applicant’s mark on the Supplemental Register, allowing competitors to freely use the term to refer to their own goods and services.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Would Chocolate Chip Blueberry Muffin be a sub-sub-genus? [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:47 pm
Two years after children were sickened and some nearly died, insurance companies and the lawyers they hire continue to deny justice to the victims – that will not last long. [read post]
