Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 3,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
[No, because of the Establishment Clause, not b/c of a general restriction on gov’t position-taking.] [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
As a matter of fact, www.droitdu.net was mainly put together with student-produced content. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:26 am
, is co-authored by Peter B. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
These reasons include: the claimed matter is functional, meaning it affects the cost or quality of the product or service; the claimed matter is merely descriptive, meaning that consumers don’t understand that it indicates source and instead think that it just describes some characteristic of the product; the claimed matter is deceptively misdescriptive, which is like descriptiveness except not true; the claimed matter is deceptive; the claimed… [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm
” “Squaw Bread”—said they didn’t mean to offend b/c it was just called “squaw bread”/they wanted to give credit to Native American origin. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
It's not an unusual communication pattern that A writes or says things to B that are actually directed at C. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:46 pm
Retailer defendants petitioned the PTO for Covered-Business-Method-Review and then immediately petitioned for a stay of the district court proceeding under AIA Section 18(b). [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:26 am
Such language provides: This act shall take effect immediately and shall not be construed either to modify the duration of alimony ordered or agreed upon or other specifically bargained for contractual provisions that have been incorporated into: a. a final judgment of divorce or dissolution; b. a final order that has concluded post-judgment litigation; or c. any enforceable written agreement between the parties. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 1:47 pm
b. any U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
© preemption is important in the 8thCir. b/c Ray v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
After the Supremes trashed the residual clause of § 924(e)(2)(B) in Johnson, is there a constitutionally-valid crime-of-violence definition in § 924(c)(3)(A) that includes the charges here? [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
That won’t work for ROP b/c so much of the regulated stuff is art. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
C. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
Similarly, referring to the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, Justice Peter McClellan and Christopher Beshara claim that ‘[i]n spite of the distasteful subject matter with which it sometimes deals, the court can occasionally be the source of humour’. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
> [14] Lynne M. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
Data Protection Commissioner [2015] EUECJ C-362/14 (06 October 2015), the CJEU held that supervisory data authorities in Member States have the joint right with the EU Commission to review whether non-EU countries provide adequate protection to personal data transferred to them from the EU despite a decision by the EU Commission that such protection is provided. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:29 am
The provision solely defines events of voluntary dissolution unrelated to the judicial dissolution rights granted by Partnership Law § 99 (c). [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Laurel M. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
The U.S. government’s petition for writ of certiorari in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 1:39 am
While there’s a lot of rhetoric about using Rule 23(c)(4) to bypass Rule 23(b)(3), courts are generally doing just fine at rejecting attempts to use Rule 23(c)(4) to certify an otherwise uncertifiable class. [read post]
