Search for: "Moore, Appeal of"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 3,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2022, 8:52 am
Notably, Judges Bush and Larsen (who sat on the en banc court) did not join Judge Moore’s dissent from that decision, and thus presumably voted with the majority. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:38 am
Thus, the Court granted early review in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 3:42 pm
Moore, Michael J. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 1:19 am
Last Friday, both slanted arguments and red herrings were present during the 90 minute en banc oral argument before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in In re Tam. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 1:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm
Moore v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
Gabrion’s conviction, Judges Merritt and Moore determined that Mr. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:35 am
Moore, Class of ’92.brian@moorelawpc.comwww.moorelawpc.com [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 10:53 am
The opinion here was penned by Judge Moore and joined by Judge Prost. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Cassens, et al Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitKAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:25 am
Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 7:44 am
§ 3599 permits federally funded habeas counsel to represent a condemned inmate in state clemency proceedings; and (2) whether a district court's denial of a request for federally funded clemency counsel may be appealed even without a certificate of appealability (COA). 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:32 am
Moore, begins by noting that “[h]ere, as in Richter, the Court reviews a decision of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granting federal habeas corpus relief in a challenge to a state criminal conviction. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:18 pm
For more information on registration for this important program, contact Ninah Moore of the ABA at ninah.moore@americanbar.org. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:12 am
The cases were consolidated for purposes of appeal. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:56 pm
"The prosecutor's comments during closing arguments regarding (Matthews') supposed exaggeration of EED, and collusion with his attorney and doctor, were both improper and flagrant," Clay wrote.Clay, joined by judge Karen Nelson Moore, also ordered the state to determine if Matthews can legally be retried or must be released because the constitutional prohibition on being tried twice for the same crime applies in this case. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:15 am
Moore, (Cal. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 7:34 am
Following re-sentencing, Franklin again appealed, arguing that his re-sentencing violated his Sixth Amendment right to fact finding by a jury. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:19 pm
How many times does the Supreme Court have to reverse on this basis before the courts of appeals clean up their acts? [read post]
