Search for: "People v Dollar" Results 1761 - 1780 of 4,624
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by Isaac Park
But he admits that “it’s been a long time” since he’s read Gideon v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 12:18 pm
 And two people who would otherwise receive $15,000 get millions of dollars instead.But, at some level, this still sounds something more akin to winning a lottery than any straightforward attempt at systemic justice, no? [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:09 pm by John Floyd
In 1997, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Ricciuti v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:39 am by Eric Goldman
Three recent Section 230 rulings stand out to me as possible bases why the AGs might now think that they can now get around Section 230: 1) People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 5:37 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
There’s one notable exception: NBC will not air the debate in order to air Sunday Night Football (New York Giants v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
 https://law.lclark.edu/programs/business_law/fall_forum/It was my great pleasure to participate in a great conference hosted by the Lewis and Clark Law School, Innovating Corporate Social Responsibility: From the Local to the Global. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am by Jim Sedor
The money followed a legal but circuitous route turbocharged by the 2014 ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:59 pm by Michael W. Huseman
As a result, millions of dollars of property are seized every year from people who are never convicted of any crimes, including $190,000 from two brothers in Aurora several years ago, neither of whom had a criminal record at the time. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:40 pm by John Bellinger
The American people will have every right to be disappointed if the President vetoes this legislation…. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 8:33 am
"Imagine how the NYT would phrase the story if it were Trump taking advantage of McCutcheon — tapping the wealthy — and Hillary reaping huge numbers of small donations from ordinary people. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm by Jeremy Saland
“This procedure must be followed even if the plea agreement contains a provision for a specific amount of restitution” (People v Morrishill, 127 AD3d at 994). [read post]