Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
Straightforwardly unlawful. b. is, I presume, based upon a misapprehension of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 [our report]. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 10:11 pm
His Majesty the King R v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm
[v] This is money that otherwise would have gone to medical providers. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The bottom-line is that this does appear to be a chance for people who were treated unfairly as part of the foreclosure process (and Lord knows there are plenty who fall into that category) to get a shot at some justice, and potentially be compensated for losses resulting from the unfair treatment. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Preface… Before I jump into this decision by a U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
In Freedom Bound, it is law that provides the means for instituting empire and its circumscriptions of legal and civic personality, from the beginnings of Spanish and English colonization of the Americas to Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
When I first read David Streitfeld’s article headline: “Homes at Risk, and No Help From Lawyers,” which ran on December 20th, in The New York Times I thought… Wow, well it’s about time… maybe someone’s finally gotten it. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
But I think it’s important that people understand why this issue is an issue at all. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
The EBA, while being aware of the use of T258/03-Hitachi and T641/00-Comvik, stated circa May 2010: “We note, in passing, that it is somewhat surprising that the referral does not address any of its questions to the validity of this way of judging an inventive step, an issue which is surely of general interest (and one which Lord Justice Jacob proposed should be put to the Enlarged Board – “How should those elements of a claim that relate to excluded subject matter be… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
TITLE Lords of finance : the bankers who broke the world / Liaquat Ahamed. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
Overstock.com Q4 2008 violated GAAP by failing to restate prior financial reports to correct a material accounting error and instead recognized a one-time gain to show its first profit in 15 quarters (Details here).Lee Webb from Stockwatch chronicled my year long battle with Overstock.com to successfully force the company to comply with SEC Regulation G for certain non-GAAP financial disclosures and my ongoing battle to force the company to comply with GAAP and SEC rules in reporting accounting… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
The Guv has proved himself surprisingly willing to not kill people over the last few months as he's commuted sentences and granted reprieves. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
The Guv has proved himself surprisingly willing to not kill people over the last few months as he's commuted sentences and granted reprieves. [read blog]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")Todd Rundgren - "Lord Chancellor's Nightmare Song" ("And bound on that journey you find your attorney. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am
A formalities specification that requires the assistance of an IT expert to understand it will deter people from using the procedure and increase the incidence of disputes for those who do so. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am
A formalities specification that requires the assistance of an IT expert to understand it will deter people from using the procedure and increase the incidence of disputes for those who do so. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 4:49 am
It is my respectful submission that my conduct falls well short of the conduct required to meet the test in Grimwade v Meagher, that is conduct which might make it appropriate for me to be removed as counsel in this matter. [read post]
