Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2007, 5:55 am
To my dismay, I could not find any basis for this new principle, beyond Lord Goldsmith's lecture reported in Stanford Law Review (Vol.59) and Justice Pasayat's own judgment in K.M.Chinnappa (T.N.Godavaraman Thirumalpad v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 8:37 pm
Amateur Youth Soccer Association v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 7:52 am
I must, of course, leave this rather long post with a bit of Shakespeare - Henry V: O noble English! [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:20 am
*For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 12:29 am
Press), examines the 1963 case, Abington v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Alaska: Lord v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:17 am
Wilkes v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 11:27 am
If you are a member of the judiciary and wish to add your credibility to the project by letting us shamelessly use your name, please put the word "judge" in the title line of your email ...Pavel Pinkava's petition for leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal's ruling in LIFFE v Pinkava (judgment here; IPKat post here) has just been refused by the House of Lords. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:06 am
Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 12:45 am
" Zorach v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:13 pm
The comments are detailed and very helpful, adding a lot to my scanty commentary, so, for the housing lawyers amongst us, it is well worth reading their comments on my posts on Shala v Birmingham Aweys v Birmingham Omar v Birmingham and now Doherty v Birmingham (House of Lords bound, apparently) And to the CLP people, lovely to see you here, what took you so long? [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 4:34 am
J.R. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:39 am
The Court of Justice put an end to it (or virtually so) with Gat v Luk. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
O’Dell edited a book on Older People in Modern Ireland which contains various interesting essays), today’s decision is at odds with a trend towards a greater understanding of human rights and older people (although of course the House of Lords did not have that question before it). [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:01 am
Shannon Quadros wrote, in comments to Us v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
This could result in no postponement of limitation periods for people involved in motor vehicle accidents in which vehiclar damage occurs. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 4:39 pm
The case is Al-Skeini and others v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 6:00 pm
The case is Dexter v. [read post]
