Search for: "People v. Downing" Results 1761 - 1780 of 17,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2017, 4:36 am by Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma
People facing sentencing on child pornography charges would be well advised to carefully consider the arguments presented by the panel in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Colorado Civil Rights Commission.[8] Yet, however emphatically stated and deeply rooted the broad principle may be, its details are often hard to pin down. [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:41 am by Steve Hall
  EJI has issued a news release, "Court Strikes Down LWOP for Juvenile Non-Homicide. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
This is probably shocking news to many people. [read post]
3 May 2013, 7:07 am by admin
The Ontario Budget came down yesterday, and includes a continued freeze of the base minimum wage at $10.25 per hour. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:32 am by Jon Hyman
Palsgraf and the cat’s-paw doctrine – from Work Matters People With Criminal Records “Need Not Apply” – from fyiscreening Supremes Pretty Consistently Oppose Retaliation – from Screw You Guys, I’m Going Home American Idol Contestant Claims in Bias Suit He Was Told to ‘Gay It Up’ – from ABA Journal Daily News Employee Relations & HR The Monty Python Guide to Being a Better Boss – from BNET Steps for… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The real issue is whether the Eighth Amendment makes it illegal to punish homeless people for public encampments.The case is City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:20 am by karen
EFF, joined by the Center for Democracy & Technology and the Constitution Project, filed a brief today asking the nation’s highest court to review the decision in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am by Frank Cranmer
The ECtHR and climate change The Grand Chamber’s ruling in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland [2024] ECHR 304, handed down on Tuesday, seems to have caused a (predictable) storm – and though nothing to do with “religion” specifically, it’s potentially very important in the wider area of human rights law. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the case at bar, the criminal court assumes the most stringent standard in People v Vilardi, that is, the “reasonable possibility” standard to apply. [read post]