Search for: "People v. London"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 1,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2009, 1:39 am
They interview about 20 people. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:40 am
Interestingly, it turns out one of my pupillage providers is less competitive than I had anticipated.They have just sent me an email telling me that my form has been printed and who will be considering it - which is a nice touch in itself as it gives a warm fuzzy glow of positive progress before the inevitable rejection - but they have also been kind enough to tell people the odds.There aree [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:31 pm
Mr Kamal, via South West London Law Centres, made a rather unusual submission. [read post]
4 May 2009, 9:40 am
The term comes from an otherwise unremarkable London divorce case, McKenzie v McKenzie, in 1971. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 5:57 pm
City of New London, CT 545 U.S. 469 (2005). [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:32 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:14 am
The most infamous case of its time, FTC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 12:57 am
Supreme Court eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:54 pm
Orr, Immigration Programme Manager at the High Commission of Canada in London, U.K., dated March 20, 2009. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:50 pm
Orr, Immigration Programme Manager at the High Commission of Canada in London, U.K., dated March 20, 2009. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 3:18 am
We've had a few tips and seen a number of comments that V&E in particular is being disingenuous. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 10:29 am
Second of the Ground 16 cases is London Borough of Brent v John Hodson [2009] EWHC 566 (QB) [Not on Bailli yet]. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:19 pm
The case is Van Alstyne v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:54 am
Supreme Court in the now-infamous eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:09 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005). [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
In relation to the provision of accommodation under the National Assistance Act 1948, my noble and learned friend, Baroness Hale of Richmond, then Hale LJ, said in R (Wahid) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2002] EWCA Civ 287 [2003] HLR 13, para 33, "[n]eed is a relative concept, which trained and experienced social workers are much better equipped to assess than are lawyers and courts, provided that they act rationally". [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:54 pm
London is currently unaffected by the cutbacks. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
Why hesitate, people may ask. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
Why hesitate, people may ask. [read post]
