Search for: "People v. North"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2010, 2:13 pm
The New York Times' "Square Feet" column today posted "Lessons on Limits of Eminent Domain at Columbia," about the recent decision in Kaur v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm
The difficult process embedded in Article V has been used by “The People” to expand rights and democracy, fix procedural deficiencies, and even overturn Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:40 pm
The case is entitled New Zealand Transport Agency v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:58 am
People v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:46 am
The 13 year old daughter was “all in” to move because she liked the people in North Carolina better (?). [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:14 am
In another case, Romano v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:21 am
Distributing Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 5:02 am
We cite Rumsfeld v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:52 pm
That all changed in 1977 when one Phoenix law firm ran an ad in a local newspaper that became the basis for the landmark decision in Bates v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:11 pm
Virginia, 2002) and juvenile defendants (Roper v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:54 am
Virgin Islands who was a plaintiff in a similar lawsuit, Segovia v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:20 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in NAACP, et al v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:33 pm
Conservatives v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:20 am
Nine people were injured and two were arrested. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
In many way, this case is similar to Moore v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:38 am
Cooper Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
These laws were subject to litigation, like the McCrory case in North Carolina and Veasey v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:22 am
For example, the Bush v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:44 pm
Indeed, in the 1936 case of United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]
