Search for: "ROGERS v. STATE" Results 1761 - 1780 of 3,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” At Yahoo Finance, Roger Parloff observes that “[a]s unions have lost strength in the country, class actions have gained importance as a key means of vindicating employee rights,” so if “employers win a simple way to knock that weapon out of workers’ hands” by prevailing in Epic Systems v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 7:55 am
"  The Fist rejects the idea that Rogers v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:32 pm
Surely this is so in Israel, whose Supreme Court pronounced on targeted killings in Public Committee against Torture in Israel (2006), and in the United States, whose Supreme Court held in Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:11 am by Ben Allen
  The District Court denied his motion, finding that the warrant was supported by probable cause, and, even if it was not so supported, the Leon good faith exception applied.In United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 12:43 pm by binder'sblog
” The Supreme Court held in the 1966 case of Sheppard v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:13 pm by A.J.B.
Roger O’Keefe, Universal Jurisdiction — Clarifying The Basic Concept, ICJ 2.3(735). [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:04 am by Charles Sartain
The question for the Texas Supreme Court in Piranha Partners et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
 Sir Roger Moore has accepted undisclosed libel damages over claims made in the Daily Mail and Mail Online that he groped an actress during the filming of For Your Eyes Only. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:20 pm by Jeff Welty
But he authored several significant criminal law opinions as well, among them the following: State v. [read post]
US District Judge Roger Benitez based his decision on the US Supreme Court’s holding in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:28 pm by Ryan
Justice Rogers dismissed the complaint because the Secretary of State cannot be ordered to remove a candidate from the ballot for alleged lack of qualifications for office. [read post]