Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 7,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am
Commentary on Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:51 am
Berman of the Sentencing Law and Policy blog reports on a Florida case which “spotlights an on-going struggle for state courts” to follow the Court’s decision in Graham v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
” In the wake of the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am
The Court also heard argument last week in Samantar v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am
United States, in which it will consider whether last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
” Michael Doyle at the Sacramento Bee briefly summarizes the facts of the case in Harrington v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:02 pm
At The Huffington Post, Dhyana Taylor observes that “[t]his week the women of the United States Supreme Court will celebrate the anniversaries of their entrance onto the highest court in the land. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in Ayala v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:06 am
Allstate, which cleared the way for certain class action suits which were formerly limited by state laws. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 11:54 am
A round that doesn't include any state or federal habeas proceedings.Is it really worth it to try again? [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:07 am
Finally, Ronald Mann covered the argument in DIRECTV v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:06 am
” The debate over the use of social science and statistics at the oral argument in Schuette v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 2:17 pm
Round 3 - MDY Indus. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
As Lyle Denniston reported for this blog, yesterday in Perry v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
United States, the Facebook threats case, continues. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:43 am
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:24 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:59 am
Needless to say, there are quite a few “other” points in Rares J’s 115 paragraphs: Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 34 For a more recent “no volitional act, therefore no infringement” case in the USA see Prof Goldman’s ‘Photobucket Qualifies for the 512(c) Safe Harbor (Again)–Wolk v. [read post]
