Search for: "STATE v. HAND"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 31,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
In this post, Tobias Seger, an Associate at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in Guest v Guest [2022] UKSC 27, handed down by the Supreme Court on 19 October 2022. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:56 pm
US v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:31 am
Twitter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:42 am
A claim pursuant to Judiciary Law 9 487 has clearly been stated. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:05 am
In ACLU of Minnesota v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:41 pm
Wired: “…People have claimed that this week’s leak of Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:21 pm
In a judgment in the case of Bayev v Russia ([2017] ECHR 572) handed down on 20 June 2017, the Third Section of European Court of Human Rights found – by six votes to one – that the so-called Russian “gay-propaganda law” banning the promotion of homosexuality violated both Article 10 and Article 14 of the Convention. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm
State Immunity, Violation of Human Rights and the Individual’s Right for Reparations – A Comment on the ICJ’s Judgment of February 2, 2012 (Germany v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:15 pm
We are discussing Wood v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:13 pm
The Court of Criminal Appeals handed down State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Such is the case in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:37 am
On August 30, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Carter v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:24 am
New Mexico, handed down yesterday. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
The Supreme Court handed down Collins v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:58 am
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court handed down judgment on 13 May 2015, dismissing the appeal. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 6:31 pm
by Kenneth Anderson Over at Lawfare, UVA professor Paul Stephan talks about the ICJ decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:00 pm
Brocail v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:32 am
If they are (as Wilson's study on state R&D tax credits suggests) a zero-sum game in which states or cities are compelled to pay to attract "star scientists," maybe they should be prohibited under the dormant Commerce Clause, as the Sixth Circuit suggested in Cuno v. [read post]
