Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 1761 - 1780 of 6,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
In other words, it’s intended to avoid rather than foster disagreement and litigation between buyer and seller. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm by Steven Boutwell
On June 27, 2018, the Louisiana Supreme Court handed down its decision in Beer Industry League of Louisiana, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
As Justice Kennedy explained: The physical presence rule has long been criticized as giving out-of-state sellers an advantage. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:12 pm by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court handed down a disastrous antitrust opinion in Ohio v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:12 pm by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court handed down a disastrous antitrust opinion in Ohio v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:56 pm by Arthur T. Phillips
However, a recent case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Heavenly Hana, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:43 am by John Rich and Beth L. Fowler
In a long awaited decision reversing 26 years of existing precedent, on June 21st the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota  v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm by Mark Walsh
Wayfair, about whether to overrule court precedents establishing the physical-presence rule for allowing states to require out-of-state sellers to tax internet purchases. [read post]