Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 1761 - 1780 of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 10:23 am
That question was recently addressed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Gene Quinn
On August 9, 2012, Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued a decision that denied in part the parties' motion to seal certain filings. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a family is allowed to pursue its lawsuit in California against Mazda Motors of American, Inc. because it made its 1993 Mazda MPV minivan with only lap seat belts in the middle of the seats of the second row in the vehicle. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:02 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The defendant objected to the expert’s opinion, and the trial court ruled that his testimony was not applicable to the standard of care that the plaintiff was entitled to receive in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Beth Graham
Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Beth Graham
Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 7:00 am by Eric W. Witt
 However, that assumption has been upended by recent decisions by the California Court of Appeal and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California invalidating employee non-solicitation agreements. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:52 am by Nazareth M. Haysbert
Hayes, United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of California, granted final approval to a class action settlement against luxury fashion house Louis Vuitton. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm by NARF
(Compel Agency Action; Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act) United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
AB 5 modifies how workers are classified as employees or independent contractors for state law purposes and codifies the 2018 California Supreme Court decision known as Dynamex. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:28 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Title: California State Republican Legislator Intervenors v. [read post]