Search for: "State v. Alexander"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm
Lori Drew and in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 5:50 am
For example, Alexander P. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 5:10 am
Yet no State has standing? [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 12:00 am
The Act also codified the Supreme Court’s holding in Alexander v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:44 pm
See Wallace v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm
" Arizona v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 4:19 am
And if Roe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 1977 Abood v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
Zinke, … their important amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 1977 Abood v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 6:25 am
Inter-American Court of Human RightsPaillama v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Wingerter v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
Facebook has said that a legal challenge against the way it transfers EU user data to the United States was “deeply flawed” and should not be referred to the EU’s top court because ample privacy protections were already in place. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:21 pm
When discussing the Bush Administration's claim of unfettered Presidential power as Commander in Chief, "liberals" would cite the various opinions in Youngstown v. [read post]
