Search for: "State v. Church" Results 1761 - 1780 of 5,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 7:25 am by Nexsen Pruet
The opinion issued by the Supreme Court of the United States in that consolidated appeal is known as Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by Rick Garnett
here, the "political divisiveness along religious lines" argument in church-state law has always been wrong: Nearly thirty-five years ago, in Lemon v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application of M) (FC)… [read post]
12 Apr 2025, 11:42 pm by Frank Cranmer
Regular readers will recall R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin), in which the claimants argued that the fact that legal recognition of religious wedding ceremonies under English law did not extend to weddings carried out in accordance with their humanist beliefs discriminated against them unjustifiably and breached their Convention rights under Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:25 am
BNA's Feb. 20 Daily Report for Executives [subscription required] discusses the options available to the Internal Revenue Service after the Minnesota federal district court decision last month in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 10:45 am
Via the District of New Jersey, please find attached the order dismissing the case in Ward v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm by Kate Howard
Cronic prejudice standard applies (as every other state and federal court to consider the question has held), or whether the Strickland v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
 It claims that the exemption violates the Establishment Clause by subsidizing churches and by creating excessive entanglement of church and state. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The state of Washington's Supreme Court yesterday heard oral arguments in Ingersoll v. [read post]