Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 1761 - 1780
of 6,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Id. at 158; Davis v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 3:30 am
Williams and Eldridge v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
Davis, which involves the standards for government-funded investigations to establish an indigent defendant’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, and Wilson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 5:45 pm
Strangers, like Carol Davis and Mr. [read post]
November Reasonably Suspicious Podcast: Let me be your lawyer dog, or I won't be your man at all ...
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
Davis, seeking funds for investigation into an ineffective assistance claim.A state district court considers Ex Parte Flores in which the key eyewitness was subjected to hypnosis before changing her ID of the suspect. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
No less an authority than the United States Supreme Court declared this a non-issue this year when they denied certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
These principles apply to allegations of legal malpractice (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88; New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc., 150 AD3d 1589, 1594 [2017]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]; Snyder v Brown Chiari, LLP, 116 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2014]; Alaimo v McGeorge, 69 AD3d 1032, 1034 [2010]). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
This morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Merit Management Group v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:36 am
Crichton, concurring in the Louisiana Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:23 am
Davis and Wilson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:27 pm
Davis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
However, according to Davis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am
Bank National Association v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:20 pm
Payne (La. 2002); see also Davis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:10 am
And in Davis v. [read post]
