Search for: "State v. Levy"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Trump v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:16 am
BellSchenck v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 10:28 am
For an example of these problems, see U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:02 pm
International human rights organizations and the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media called the accusations levied against Sharipov baseless and called for his release. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:08 am
-Gary V. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
Justice Breyer, who dissented in Apprendi, opposed the extension of that rule to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:14 am
Amazon was not paying such a compensation, hence the lawsuit.Here the Court relied heavily on the earlier decision on levies in Copydan Båndkopi v Nokia Danmark (C‑463/12), in which it was decided that national legislation has a lot of leeway in providing details to the implementation of private copying in each jurisdiction given that the InfoSoc Directive does not specify the regime for enacting compensation schemes. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:41 am
” DeBoer v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In 1895, Congress sought to impose an income tax, but was stopped by the Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
In Zuid-Chemie v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 7:53 pm
“[M]oneys…due from, or payable by, the United States…to any individual…shall be subject, in like manner…to withholding in accordance with State law…by a State agency administering a program under a State plan approved under this part or by an individual obligee, to enforce the legal obligation of the individual to provide child support or alimony. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am
– practical ramifications of ECJ’s decision in MPS v Murphy and FAPL v QC Leisure (1709 Copyright Blog) Levies for private copying when blank media are imported: who pays? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
– which concerns a State-sponsored dictionary and book that contained derogatory stereotypes of Roma. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:18 am
Millennium Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies Media interest in privacy injunctions was revived with Imogen Thomas’ statement in open court in the case of CTB v NGN, which stated the claimant footballer had accepted there was no basis to accuse her of blackmail. [read post]
