Search for: "State v. Mar" Results 1761 - 1780 of 4,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2018, 11:50 am by Chidera Anyanwu
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm by Chidera Anyanwu
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm by Chidera Anyanwu
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:06 pm by William Ford
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the decision of the Eastern District of Virginia in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by William Ford
Thursday, Mar. 1 at 10:00 a.m.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will host an event on “A National Machine Intelligence Strategy for the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am by Aimee Denholm
On the question of jurisdiction, it was held that Sala v SSHD [2016] UKUT 411 had rightly been overruled by the Court of Appeal in a subsequent decision on the interpretation of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1003), reg 26. [read post]