Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 14,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2009, 12:32 am
10thCir-Denver.jpg In a trial involving aggravated sexual abuse of a minor in Indian country, evidence of the defendant’s prior child molestation convictions, over 20 to 40 years earlier, was admissible under FRE 414 despite the lapse of time between the prior offenses and the current charged conduct because the strong similarity of the incidents made them relevant, in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 1:49 am
HTTP.jpg Internet chatroom conversations about having sex with minors was admissible to show the defendant's knowledge of the age of his victim and absence of mistake under FRE 404(b); a sufficient showing was made that he made the other chats and not other family members who had access to the computer, in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:08 am
California v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court issued its historic ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v Hellerstedt--the most significant abortion-related ruling from the Court in more than two decades. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
In Hamama v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 1:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:04 am
Garcia v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 11:17 am
The statute at issue in the case, State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:08 pm
Gregor gets busted for contacting a (fake) minor with the intent to commit a sexual offense. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 5:15 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
In Washington v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 6:32 am
In the State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:51 am
Summary of Decision issued February 20, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: In re: SRB-M, a minor, DJM v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am
In separate orders (142568, 142566 & (67)), the Court granted leave to appeal in In re Mays, Minors. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:04 am
Title: Ortiz v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 8:43 am
We regret the delay caused in part by our state’s court system and acknowledge considerable changes and milestones could occur for a minor child during such a substantial delay that may alter the determination of an arrangement created in the best interests of the child. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:38 am
Vejdeland and others v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
Cites to Doe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 7:24 am
In Garza v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
