Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 11,952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2025, 10:38 am
#StopTheSADScheme Case Citation: GM Photo, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:16 pm
This week, the Oregon Court of Appeals, in Avanti Press, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 11:26 am
In 2015, in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Planned Parenthood is under fire because of recently released videos showing senior officials seemingly stating prices the organization charges for selling fetal body parts. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:14 am
” Section 1, in turn, specifies a price of $100, payable within six months. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
”[13] Many products sold for a sales price less than the cost of their materials are intentionally manufactured and sold. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications - the Ninth Circuit held the Sherman Antitrust Act permits "price squeeze" claims against companies with no duty to sell to others at wholesale. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
Lowry v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 3:46 am
Here are the materials in City of New York v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
For instance, in Centrafam v Sterling case [(1976) F.S.R. 164], the real beneficiary was the parallel importer who sold the drug nalidixic acid (Negram) twice the price in England, not the final consumer or the patent holder. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:18 pm
This reduces the gravity of the Travel Tab refusal and the predatory pricing. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 6:57 am
Price laments that: "only thing that arguably makes Clewis seem unworkable is this Court’s lamentable propensity to grant a State’s petition for discretionary review every three or four years to revisit the question whether it is unworkable. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:34 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Billy Long v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:05 am
By way of example, the state passage rate for the July 2009 New York State bar exam was 72%. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
In People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court decided Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm
The class action lawsuit (Parent v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:43 am
The Court cited Article 249 EC which states that ‘a decision shall be binding in its entirety upon those to whom it is addressed’ and the case of AssiDomän Kraft Products AB v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR I-5363 (Case C-310/97). [read post]
