Search for: "State v. Self" Results 1761 - 1780 of 14,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision, Petitioner had… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision, Petitioner had… [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Almost thirty years after R v Lavallee, in which the parameters of self-defence were broadened to include the perspective of an abused woman, R v Ryan presented the court with its first opportunity to consider the implications of battered woman syndrome and coercive control with regard to another defence: duress. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Beyond those limits, federal common law or federal statutes, not a self-serving body of state law, must fill the void. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 2:30 pm
  So unlike an actual trial court judge, Polsky's self-interest is definitely at stake.Sure, Polsky's got lots of other potential arbitration parties. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:18 pm by Tom Smith
For them, it is self-evident that Trump is guilty of insurrection, despite his Senate acquittal and the failure of any court to convict him of the charge. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
In its 2-1 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by Maureen Johnston
Jerejian 13-827Issue: (1) Whether the Second Amendment secures a right to carry handguns outside the home for self-defense; and (2) whether state officials violate the Second Amendment by requiring that individuals wishing to exercise their right to carry a handgun for self-defense first prove a “justifiable need” for doing so. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Complaint An excerpt: This is a suit against the United States for breach of contract and statute by the Indian Health Service (“IHS”), an agency in the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”). [read post]