Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 1761 - 1780 of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2010, 5:27 am by Ted Frank
[WSJ] WaPo editorializes in favor of preemption in consumer financial protection. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
  If s/he doesn’t, there’s probably a good reason why not (for example, a lot of psychiatrists don't bring up suicide risk with depressed but non-suicidal patients), and forcing a manufacturer to provide information a doctor doesn’t want to provide is rarely a good idea. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm by Ron Coleman
Absent the rare circumstance of an entire industry dedicated to counterfeits, à la Vuitton, if an enterprise can’t fathom protecting its value proposition without some kind of gaudy trademark protection, ultimately something has to give. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:52 pm
Dep’t of Parks & Recreation v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am by Florian Mueller
The FTC claimed yesterday that it was about protecting consumers, not Sony but that is just lip service to its mission of protecting American consumers. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am by Brianne Gorod
Recently, for example, Congress decided to make the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau removable only for cause. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:57 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Its significance can be observed in several key areas: Consumer Protection: Business negligence law plays a crucial role in safeguarding consumer rights. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:57 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Its significance can be observed in several key areas: Consumer Protection: Business negligence law plays a crucial role in safeguarding consumer rights. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  If so, then state law can’t just say, in effect, “pay or don’t play. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:03 pm by Marcel Pemsel
The General Court’s decision The General Court dismissed the opponent’s appeal (case T-117/23). [read post]