Search for: "Tenant v. State" Results 1761 - 1780 of 3,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 1:38 pm by J
In Issa v Hackney London Borough Council (1997) 29 H.L.R. 640, the court noted that the failure to update s.8 left tenants  …wholly without remedy in the civil courts against their landlords, however grievously their health may have suffered because they are living in damp, unfit conditions… Likewise, in Habinteg Housing Association v James (1994) 27 HLR 299: We are told that the Law Commission has been considering such a problem. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:46 am
Of the two, the s.85 application has other benefits for the tenant, for example by altering a previous possession order so that the landlord can’t issue a warrant without notice. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm by NL
The term breached must be a term of the tenancy, not a 'personal obligation' (Paddington Churches Housing Association v Boateng 1999 Legal Action 27). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm by NL
The term breached must be a term of the tenancy, not a 'personal obligation' (Paddington Churches Housing Association v Boateng 1999 Legal Action 27). [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
To view a copy the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Barry v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 3:15 pm
I was scanning the Court of Appeal judgments, waiting for White v Knowsley, when this came up: London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Ansell [2007] EWCA Civ 326 Now that is interesting. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:01 am
Violators are subject to arrest and prosecution by the Police Department.' Deponent further states that defendant was neither a tenant nor a guest in the above-mentioned premises. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:34 am by Bob Kelley
In Gamsen v State Farm, 36 FLW D1630A (Fla 4th DCA 2011), the appellate court held that State Farm’s counsel had “quite simply” not asked pertinent questions during jury selection to elicit information about the juror’s litigation history. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:14 am by Howard Friedman
XII, Sec 7 of Hawaii's Constitution provides:The State reaffirms and shall protect all rights, customarily and traditionally exercised for  subsistence, cultural and religious purposes and possessed by ahupua'a tenants who are descendants of native Hawaiians who inhabited the Hawaiian Islands prior to 1778, subject to the right of the State to regulate such rights.Last week, the Hawaii Supreme Court heard oral arguments (audio recording of arguments) in… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v Rafailov, 41 AD3d 603, 604; see also High Fashions Hair Cutters v Commercial Union Ins. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 9:22 am
Sokolov v Village of Freeport, 52 NY2d 341, 345-346).I'm not sure how economic benefit relates to conducting searches. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 12:16 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITSocial Services Law State Agencies Relieved of Liability for City's Shortcomings in Implementing Welfare Reforms Reynolds, plaintiffs-appellees v. [read post]