Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 4:06 am
Last month, I blogged about how the Delaware legislature was barreling towards passing legislation to reverse the impact of the ATP Tour v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:30 pm
Does Lane v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:09 am
In their landmark 2008 case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
Prince v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 5:27 pm
With less than three days to go before the FIFA World Cup’s kick-off [the first match, Brazil v Croatia, is due on 12 June; the final, England v Italy, is surprisingly scheduled only two days later -- the complete calendar can be found here], a focus on the IP-related aspects of the event is in order. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:17 pm
The Court rejected Facebook’s argument that the class definition was overly broad and that it had several problems, including that the class definition: (i) has no temporal limitations; (ii) does not address the fact that many users use false names or unidentifiable portraits; (iii) does not address the fact that Sponsored Stories were used for non-commercial entities as well as for businesses; (iv) does not address the necessary element of lack of consent; and (v)… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Yet, the NDA Government has not officially communicated to the people why it thought it fit to bring in these twin Ordinances. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
" That's self-defense, even though it's based upon a mistake of fact.You can see why we don't punish people for that. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:48 pm
A recent essay from law professor John McGinnis, titled “Machines v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:02 pm
Arguably Retrieve's service does offer content to a large, indeterminate number of people, and falls under the Article.Although the ECJ saw that Retriever's service would therefore be under the definition of Article 3(1), the matter was not that straightforward. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:24 am
This should scare a lot of people into thinking about corporate compliance. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:03 pm
State of Maine v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 2:04 pm
The strongest precedent for Dina would be Worldwide Church of God v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:28 pm
Tilem cited the case of People v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm
We the People adopted constitutional changes outside of the procedure stipulated in Article V. [read post]
4 May 2014, 11:22 am
The third-party doctrine of Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 1:36 pm
Engert, V., Plessow, F., Miller, R., Kirschbaum, C., & Singer, T. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:20 am
In her heartfelt dissent in Schuette v. [read post]
