Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 11,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Also of appellate note The Debate of Dynamex's Retroactivity Head to the California Supreme Court and Ethics at the California Coastal Commission.Regarding that last article, don't miss the published case here, which notes in the intro: "And we publish, to also affirm—and remind the profession of—the importance of candor toward the court. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
The Clean Air Act permits California alone to adopt its own standards for certain emissions, while requiring other states to follow either California’s standards or federal regulations. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:24 am
Although the new law may be subject to challenge in court, affected public companies and those contemplating an initial public offering within the next year should begin to consider board composition and director recruiting, or risk future fines by the State, pressure from institutional investors, or exploitation by activists. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:20 am
” Avenatti told Selna he’s “still a member of the [California State] Bar. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am
The Ninth Circuit case in California: Sulitzer v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:54 am
Going forward, in California state courts, employees will not be barred by representative action waivers from pursuing PAGA claims. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:18 pm
Those working in presumably higher-paying sectors would pay higher bills.In-house counsel at large corporations would see their annual bills from the state bar jump to $904 a year, for instance. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
The United States Supreme Court reversed two decisions granting habeas relief. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:57 am
Although access to medical marijuana was approved by California voters in the late 1990s, individual municipalities throughout the state have enacted ordinances that bar shops from opening in their districts. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:04 am
[Bloomberg] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: 5th Circuit, Attorney Misconduct, Bar Admission, Bar Exams, Biglaw, BRACAnalysis, BRCA1, BRCA2, California, D.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 1:57 pm
State of Washington (Treaty Right to Take Shellfish) California Valley Miwok Tribe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:10 pm
Supreme Court ruled that federal regulations setting vehicle safety standards do not bar lawsuits seeking damages from automakers for installing lap-only seat belts. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
Jerry Brown appoints Goodwin Liu to California Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:53 am
Since the Due Process Clause bars state courts from exercising jurisdiction if there is not a sufficient connection between the state and the conduct or the defendant, the question is constitutional in stature. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:14 am
Dec. 23, 2013) The court found that the federal Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 preempts state consumer lawsuits alleging violations of OFPA and California’s federally approved state organic program (SOP) (codified under the California Organic Products Act of 2003, COPA). [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
The trial court was fine with this, but the appellate court called the testimony “simply incredible. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 7:56 pm
Now, The Recorder reports, Glass is trying California, and his case is going to the state supreme court. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:41 am
At the higher court, attorneys for the women claimed that Maryland has a long history of recognizing marriages from other states that were otherwise barred in Maryland, and that this history should play a role in determining the state’s attitudes towards same-sex marriage today. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:07 am
The public has called administration of the test into question, due to COVID 19 health concerns, and the response from state and national bar examination boards and state courts have been a hodgepodge of confusion and guarding the status quo. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
When a California statute limiting noncitizen hiring was challenged on federal supremacy grounds in the 1970s, the Supreme Court sided with California, ruling that its statute was permissible absent “any specific indication in either the wording or the legislative history of the [federal Immigration and Nationality Act] that Congress intended to preclude even harmonious state regulation touching on [noncitizens] in general, or the employment of illegal… [read post]
