Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 9,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
”); United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:21 am
That provision renders non-citizens inadmissible to the U.S. if the deciding consular or other government official "knows, or has reasonable ground to believe" that the non-citizen "seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in any . . . unlawful activity. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:50 am
Earlier today, a closely divided Supreme Court upheld President Donald Trump's policy barring most entry into the United States by citizens of five Muslim-majority nations. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:51 am
The Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA) creates a comprehensive scheme to pay compensation for an eligible employee’s disability or death resulting from injury occurring upon the navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:57 am
Mack Trucks v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 2:47 am
A Ninth Circuit appeals court ruling may bring a question back to the Supreme Court about the ability to sue border agents at the United States-Mexico border for fatal shootings. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
Muskrat v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 12:37 pm
"At which point plaintiff ends the debate by saying: "All true. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1959 case of Bibb v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:16 am
United States, the latest opportunity to revisit the Third-Party Doctrine that served as a facile diversion when created, and has undermined any potential for digital privacy in the future. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm
[An interesting threats case, from the Louisiana Court of Appeal] From Terrell v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
United States holds that Miranda is a constitutional rule, not some sort of supervisory decision; and 42 U.S.C. 1983 provides that a person who "causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:35 pm
For example, in State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 6:01 pm
United States. [read post]
