Search for: "U.S. v. Promin"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2013, 9:43 am
In the last month, the decision in Noel Canning v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 8:29 am
In particular, they are coordinating some of their defensive efforts against InterDigital, a U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
More than a week after oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:33 am
V. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
The notions that an armed conflict exists, that it is not limited to Afghanistan but extends at least to those places from which the enemy strikes, and that it includes Al Qaeda’s co-belligerent forces are all contested by advocacy groups, international organizations, and prominent figures in the legal academy. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:52 pm
” As Wells posted earlier today, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Clapper v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
Moreover, there have been prominent cultural property cases featuring fakes, including the Arnold Peter Weiss case, where the convicted defendant possessed forged ancient coins, and the seminal case of U.S. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:04 pm
Ct. 1097 (U.S. 2012). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:04 pm
Ct. 1097 (U.S. 2012). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:41 am
That's the case in which the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:33 am
Klinger v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 12:08 pm
Ed. 2d 500 (U.S. 2011) (internal quotations and citations omitted). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:59 am
But I am aware of only one case that suggests that TRIPS might be relevant for interpreting U.S. substantive law: in Rotec Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:53 pm
With a delay of a few days due to a busy schedule and other circumstances I now finally find the time to report on a Huawei v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:35 am
Fteja v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
” That is to say, the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School and the principal author of The Oxford Introductions to U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:11 pm
The Seyfarth panel will specifically address the following topics: Significant U.S. and state supreme court non-compete and trade secret decisions, including a discussion of choice of law, forum selection, and arbitration issues; Important legislative efforts, including several states enacting legislation to protect employees’ “personal” social media accounts, the recent amendments to the Economic Espionage Act in response to the Second Circuit’s U.S.… [read post]
